HOW TO GET 100 FROM 50. READ!!!
People often ask, how one can increase one's score from 50 to 100?
Well, you can of course do it the normal way: mug, mug, and mug. Yet, many ppl, esp mathematicians, have recently come out with new ways to do so.
Famous Greek mathematician Pluto just discovered that it takes no more than 50 steps involving ln n dy dx n even dot product to do.
Yet, a few Singaporeans beat him by successfully proving that one just needs to increase one's score one at a time, 50 times, to get the same result. Much less complicated than ln n i.
Yet, for the more impatient ones, 50's too long. How about cutting it down to... a magican ONE? Adding 50'll do, as shown by another famous mathematician Novena only yesterday.
But, there's still a small group of people who fear such a large no. Seeking specialist help, they've been advised to assume (like all physicists do) that 5's no diff from 10. At 10% significance level, this's found to be statistically correct.
Then, one great guy, Robert Keano , who managed to inject new confidence n desire into his teammates with his no-nonsense apprach, came out with a solution. Very simple. No, not times two. Mitosis's highly undesirable as it's unreliable.
The solution: add a zero at the back! The more the merrier rite? Don't get 500 can always get a 100, as they'll take the max they can give (remember, max 2 at the end of bio structured qns?). =D
So, end another crappy entry. One more day le. Jia You!
Well, you can of course do it the normal way: mug, mug, and mug. Yet, many ppl, esp mathematicians, have recently come out with new ways to do so.
Famous Greek mathematician Pluto just discovered that it takes no more than 50 steps involving ln n dy dx n even dot product to do.
Yet, a few Singaporeans beat him by successfully proving that one just needs to increase one's score one at a time, 50 times, to get the same result. Much less complicated than ln n i.
Yet, for the more impatient ones, 50's too long. How about cutting it down to... a magican ONE? Adding 50'll do, as shown by another famous mathematician Novena only yesterday.
But, there's still a small group of people who fear such a large no. Seeking specialist help, they've been advised to assume (like all physicists do) that 5's no diff from 10. At 10% significance level, this's found to be statistically correct.
Then, one great guy, Robert Keano , who managed to inject new confidence n desire into his teammates with his no-nonsense apprach, came out with a solution. Very simple. No, not times two. Mitosis's highly undesirable as it's unreliable.
The solution: add a zero at the back! The more the merrier rite? Don't get 500 can always get a 100, as they'll take the max they can give (remember, max 2 at the end of bio structured qns?). =D
So, end another crappy entry. One more day le. Jia You!
posted by BOO! @ 10:34 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home